ICG: Kurdish question would be solved through dialogue not war

Print
PDF

International Crisis Group says a solution to the Kurdish issue can only lie in advancing the constitutional, language and legal reforms

According to a new report (you can downoad it here) by the Brussels-based think-tank International Crisis Group (ICG) a solution to the Kurdish issue can only lie in advancing the constitutional, language and legal reforms of the past decade that have gone part way to giving Tur­kish Kurds equal rights.
The group points out that "a hot war and militaristic tactics did not solve the Kurdish problem in the 1990s and will not now".
Of course entering the path of reforms means that all of the parties involved in the conflict should take steps, adds ICG. And in the report recommendation it points out that "the PKK must immediately end" its new wave of attacks, and "the Turkish authorities must control the escalation with the aim to halt all violence".
The group also says that "the Turkish authorities must implement radical judicial, social and political measures that persuade all Turkish Kurds they are fully respected citizens. They should reach out to non-violent nationalists and not abandon long-standing negotiations on disarmament with the PKK, including its jailed leader, Abdullah Öcalan".
On its part the the Kurdish movement according to the recommendation of the ICG "must firmly commit to a legal, non-violent struggle within Turkey, and its elected representatives must take up their seats in parliament, the only place to shape the country-wide reforms that can give Turkish Kurds long-denied universal rights".

Offering a questionable reading of why the so called government's "Democratic Opening" did not deliver as expected, the group acknowledges that "while making these reforms, the authorities have arrested hundreds of Turkish Kurd nationalists, including many elected municipal officials and other nationalist party members. More than 3,000 nationalist activists are behind bars, many punished as “terrorists” for the non-violent expression of opinions under laws for which the AKP is responsible" but arguably blames the Kurdish movement for the government's failing in delivering an amnesty. "On the other hand, - ICG says - what should have been the centrepiece of the Democratic Opening – a ground-breaking PKK amnesty in October 2009 – foundered when Turkish Kurd nationalists exploited it for propaganda purposes". Clearly this was not the case as an amnesty was hardly on the AKP's agenda.

Assessing the role of the international community, the report points out that now it is only playing only indirect roles in this conflict. It does urge Turkey to understand that it "will be unable to present itself credibly as the regional democratic standard bearer if it chooses military means alone to try to solve its Kurdish problem. Alongside legitimate security measures, it must fully satisfy the universal human rights of its Turkish Kurd citizens".

Comments

avatar Takeshi
0
 
 
There is a Turkish state terror agiasnt the Kurdish people for years now. The annihilation and denial policies agiasnt the existence of the Kurds continues. As a result, Kurds have been trying to defend their existence and rights. Every nation has a right to defend themselves under any attacks carried out agiasnt them. And this has been accepted internationally. Then WHY WHEN KURDS DEFEND THEMSELVES AGAINST A STATE TERROR BECOMES AND ACCEPTED AS A TERRORISTS? The reason for this is basically, the kurdish people and Kurdistan has been colonised by regional forces as well as by the international forces to this very day. Kurdish people and Kurdistan have no status. Therefore, people with no status have no rights other than be called bandits' and/or terrorists'. I am asking to all of you, one side do not allow any basic rights of 50 million people and using all sort of means of violance, including genocides, to this status to be continue, and the other side wants their basic rights of being a nation and trying to defend themselves which trying to end their existence. Who are the terrorists? This is a game going on for the last 200 years with the birth of nation base states. 200 years ago kurds being called bandits' and now 200 years later they called terrorists'. Why? Because they have been trying to defend their most natural rights of being a nation and human beings. That is all. We, as kurds, will defend ourselves under any attacks, doesn't matter from whoever comes and doesn't matter whatever they call us. Who gives damm about it anymore. Enough is enough!
Name *
Code   
ChronoComments by Joomla Professional Solutions
Submit Comment
Cancel
Name *
Code   
The editors have decided not to pre-select comments from readers. Nonetheless they underline that the sole owners and responsible of the comments are the authors themselves whose opinions they represent and that under no circumstances dirittiglobali.it could be held responsible for any offensive comments to the rights of others. The editors point out that are not allowed and will be immediately removed:
- Messages not related to the topic of the article
- Messages offensive to anyone
- Messages with racist or sexist content
- Messages that constitutes a violation of present laws
(incitement to crime or violence, defamation, etc.).
Submit Comment

Our Editorial


Here you can read all our editorials, just press the Title
AKP, Arresting the right to make politics, by Orsola Casagrande
ICG: Kurdish question would be solved through dialogue not war, by Orsola Casagrande

Who's Online

Now online:
  • no members
  • 10 guests
  • 4 robots
Latest members:
  • Grepulaaval
  • GuesTestFr
  • alexpril
  • Attisyicopy
  • JupFrurnJania

Statistics

Members : 1053
Content : 2899
Content View Hits : 1831707

Disclaimer

This website is indeed a blog and not an online newspaper. It has no commercial aim and access is completely free. Some of the pictures that we publish are taken from the internet, as well as some articles and news; should their use violates copyrights, please do inform us and we will immediately remove them from the site.

Every published article in this site clearly states author and source. The site www.globalrights.info does not necessarily shares and agrees with the content and opinion of what is published and comes from other sources and media, and therefore takes no responsibility about it.
Comments by the readers are to be attributed solely to the readers themselves who are therefore fully responsible for what they write. www.globalrights.info takes no responsibility over comments by the readers.